P.S.O. & Their Recordings - what I like
July 16th, 2006Like with creative endeavours in general most of them are crap, most of them heinously so. So it is with pso’s and so it definitly is with phone sex recordings.
My preferences are for the recording to sound like a real person recounting a “real” hot event or constructing a hot scenario - there being no sense of reading a prepared text. Close to someone touching themselves as they tell it because it gets them hot too.
And details are very important, and lack of cliches in general and ridiculous names for sexual organs and the employment of such, in particular.
And then there’s the all important “voice”. Any voice that sounds like it means it will do, but if it’s a little lower in register than ‘teen’ squeal, has some air in it without quite becoming Marlena Diertrich …. then we’re approaching the pinnacle. The kind of voice that … well let me quote that world authority on alll things PSO .. myself .. from Sept of 2005 in response to calling one of Abigail’s recordings .. I wrote this :
“
I saved up my pennies to listen to this one. Central question raised: “If Abigail could give me the most intense sexual pleasure imaginable would I become entirely hers?”. Well I got so turned on by the way she was talking, what she was doing and what she was saying that I found myself answering “Yes, yes, …YES” and there was a further choice for me to make near the end … mmmmm … dirty one of course… It’s her manner, pacing, intonation that gets to me, dear lord she could be reading the phone book and I’d probably still end up feeling ‘owned’!! Bags of detail, very vivid, sensual, intense, with dose of kink and a hint of darkness. Bon Appetit! ”
‘NUff said?
No Comments
No comments yet.
Comments RSS TrackBack Identifier URI
Leave a comment






